FAQs on New Short-term or Important Employees and Worldwide Graduates Program | Immigration Canada

Our immigration lawyers know that on April 14, 2021, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) introduced that's launching new applications that can enable at...

Congratulations 2021 CBHS Corridor of Fame Inductees

Congratulations to the 2021 Christian Brothers Excessive College Corridor of Fame inductees: Dennis M. Craven, ’89; Joseph P. Croteau, ’72; Patrick Dilworth, M.D., ’76;...

How Show You Are NOT in a Widespread Regulation Relationship | Widespread Regulation Legal professionals | YLaw Group

As common law lawyers, we get quite a few inquiries from {couples} who've disputes over whether or not they have been widespread regulation or...


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Tennessee case abstract on divorce.

Rania Anwar Al Qaisi v. Diab Mahmoud Alia

The husband on this Davidson County, Tennessee, case was born and raised in Kuwait and had a level in mechanical engineering.  After changing into a U.S. citizen, he attended a commerce college to change into a licensed mechanic.  On the age of 42, he married in Jordan, when the spouse was 27 years previous.  She had labored as an inside designer in Jordan, however didn’t work in america.  That they had a daughter in 2015.

The husband operated a enterprise shopping for and promoting automobiles, however the enterprise proved to be unprofitable.  When he was provided a job as supervisor of a cellular telephone firm retailer, the couple moved to North Carolina.  The wedding saved deteriorating, and in 2018, the husband was transferred to Nashville.  After a home dispute, the spouse went to the police and obtained an order of safety, and the husband was arrested.  Shortly thereafter, the spouse filed for divorce.

Whereas the case was pending, the spouse filed a movement for contempt, alleging that the husband had transferred $262,000 to a international account.  The husband was present in contempt, however for the reason that sister to whom he transferred the cash refused to return it, there was no approach for the husband to purge the contempt.

A trial was held, and in early 2020, the court docket entered its last decree.  The trial decide discovered that the husband was “vulnerable to excessive exaggerations” and was not a reputable witness.

After checking out the testimony, the trial court docket named the spouse as the first residential father or mother and gave her 246 days of parenting time, with the husband having 119 days.

The spouse was making about $2150 per 30 days at a restaurant and driving for Uber.  The husband claimed to be making $300 per week, however the trial court docket discovered that the husband offered inadequate proof of his earnings, lots of which had been money.  The court docket discovered him to be voluntarily underemployed and pegged his earnings at over $37,000.  It due to this fact set his little one help obligation at $488 per 30 days.

The trial court docket took the $262,000 switch under consideration when making the property settlement and alimony awards.  The alimony award was set at $1,070 per 30 days, and the spouse was awarded legal professional charges.  The husband then appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals.

The appeals court docket first seemed on the imputed earnings of the husband and agreed that the trial court docket had taken the correct strategy.   It agreed with the decrease court docket that the husband had not correctly documented his earnings and that he was voluntarily underemployed.  In distinction, it seemed on the spouse’s earnings in a restaurant, as an Uber driver, and as a supply driver for Amazon.

The husband argued that the alimony quantity had been set too excessive, however as soon as once more, the appeals court docket agreed with the decrease court docket.  The husband offered a chart of his bills to the appeals court docket, however the court docket famous that these quantities weren’t correctly within the trial document.  The appeals court docket referred to as this a “belated try to piece collectively proof that he ought to have confirmed at trial” and rejected it.  After reviewing the proof, the court docket affirmed the alimony award.

Lastly, the court docket seemed on the parenting time and agreed that the decrease court docket had acted appropriately.

For these causes, the Court docket of Appeals affirmed, and taxed the prices of enchantment in opposition to the husband.

No. M2020-00390-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28,  2021).

See unique opinion for actual language.  Authorized citations omitted.

To study extra, see Property Division in Tennessee Divorce.

- A word from our sposor -

Husband Transfers $262K to Sister Should Pay Alimony